WNA Globe

World News by Wild Rose

#Sabarimala ร—

Courts cannot reform faith, says SC in Sabarimala review

Religion must mend itself to stay relevant, say women who entered Kerala templeย to enforce right to worship under a 2018 verdict; religious practices must harmonise with social reform, they say

Norms must govern places of worship or risk โ€˜anarchyโ€™, Chishtiโ€“Nizami descendant says in Sabarimala case

Syed Altamash Nizami says the faith of a believer cannot yield to the whim of a third-party interloper or a tourist to walk into the sanctum sanctorum

Pandalam family member criticises Kerala for stance in Sabarimala entry dispute

Senior representative of erstwhile royal family criticises government in Supreme Court for not being firm in opposing petitions filed by non-believers questioning the age-old rituals of Sabarimala temple

Sabarimala hearing: Should judges rise above their religious perceptions when examining matters of conscience, SC judge asks

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan says a judge cannot be identified with his personal religion when asked to examine a matter of faith and conscience

Logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems, says SC

Nine-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant continues hearing on Sabarimala entry issue

No devotee of Ayyappa would have moved SC challenging exclusion of women of menstruating age: Justice Nagarathna

The judge says the question whether a stranger to a denomination could question a practice in a public interest petition ought to be taken up as the first issue to be decided by the Sabarimala Bench

SC hearing on Sabarimala women entry LIVE: Supreme Court to continue hearing of pleas today

Centre on Tuesday said that the issue of restriction on the entry of women aged between 10 and 50 years at the temple falls within the domain of religious faith

Social ill cannot be branded as โ€˜religious practiceโ€™, says Supreme Court on maiden day of Sabarimala reference hearing

Legislature, not courts, is entitled to enact social reform, the Centre responds; as the Union government argues whether the judges have the expertise to decide on the matter, the court says it is empowered to examine opinions of experts.

Women cannot be seen as โ€˜untouchablesโ€™ for three days a month: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case

Centre objects to 2018 ruling drawing parallels between the Sabarimala bar on menstruating women and the practice of untouchability; S-G claims India is not as patriarchal or gender-stereotyped as the West understands

Watch: Sabarimala case: How did it begin and where is it now?

The Supreme Court of India has now begun final hearings in the long-running Sabarimala case. A nine-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant is hearing a batch of petitions that go beyond just one temple. At the core, the court is looking at a much larger question. To what extent can courts intervene in matters of religion? And what exactly counts as an essential religious practice under Article 25 of the Constitution?

SC hearing on Sabarimala LIVE: Nine-judge Bench to hear pleas on religious discrimination against women

The Bench has said it would also examine the "scope and extent of judicial review," concerning a religious practice as referred under Article 25 of the Constitution